<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SCHWARTZ + SCIARA, P.C.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.schwartzsciara.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.schwartzsciara.com</link>
	<description>Protecting Your Interests</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:08:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Enlisted Sikh Becomes First in 30 Years to Win Right to Wear Faith Articles in Army</title>
		<link>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/enlisted-sikh-becomes-first-in-30-years-to-win-right-to-wear-faith-articles-in-army</link>
		<comments>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/enlisted-sikh-becomes-first-in-30-years-to-win-right-to-wear-faith-articles-in-army#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schwartzsciara.com/?p=404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marcia Coyle
The National Law Journal
September 03, 2010
For the first time in more than 30 years, the U.S. military has allowed an enlisted Sikh soldier to maintain his religiously mandated turban, beard and hair while serving in the Army.
A team of lawyers in the Washington, D.C., office of McDermott Will &#38; Emery, and attorneys at the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/enlisted-sikh-becomes-first-in-30-years-to-win-right-to-wear-faith-articles-in-army/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Same-Sex Couple Cannot Get Divorced in Texas, Appeals Court Rules</title>
		<link>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/same-sex-couple-cannot-get-divorced-in-texas-appeals-court-rules</link>
		<comments>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/same-sex-couple-cannot-get-divorced-in-texas-appeals-court-rules#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schwartzsciara.com/?p=401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Same-Sex Couple Cannot Get Divorced in Texas, Appeals Court Rules
Miriam Rozen
Texas Lawyer
September 02, 2010
On Tuesday, Dallas&#8217; 5th Court of Appeals sided with the Texas office of the attorney general, ruling that a same-sex couple cannot get divorced in Texas.
A three-justice panel of the 5th Court granted the OAG&#8217;s petition for a writ of mandamus but [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/same-sex-couple-cannot-get-divorced-in-texas-appeals-court-rules/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook&#8217;s Ad Practices Draw Class Action on Behalf of Calif. Minors</title>
		<link>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/facebooks-ad-practices-draw-class-action-on-behalf-of-calif-minors</link>
		<comments>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/facebooks-ad-practices-draw-class-action-on-behalf-of-calif-minors#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Sciara</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schwartzsciara.com/?p=399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook has not obtained parental consent to use the names and likenesses of minors as required under California law, says plaintiffs attorney
Amanda Bronstad
The National Law Journal
September 01, 2010
A class action has been filed against Facebook Inc. alleging that the social networking site illegally uses the names and likenesses of minors in California for advertising and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/facebooks-ad-practices-draw-class-action-on-behalf-of-calif-minors/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9th Circuit: Stolen Valor Act Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/9th-circuit-stolen-valor-act-unconstitutional</link>
		<comments>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/9th-circuit-stolen-valor-act-unconstitutional#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schwartzsciara.com/?p=392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[9th Circuit: Stolen Valor Act Unconstitutional
Court agrees that the law is a violation of free-speech rights
The Associated Press
August 18, 2010
A three-year-old federal law that makes it a crime punishable by up to a year in jail to falsely claim to have received a medal from the U.S. military is unconstitutional, a federal appeals court panel [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/9th-circuit-stolen-valor-act-unconstitutional/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Birther&#8217; Attorney&#8217;s $20,000 Fine Allowed To Stand By Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/birther-attorneys-20000-fine-allowed-to-stand-by-supreme-court</link>
		<comments>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/birther-attorneys-20000-fine-allowed-to-stand-by-supreme-court#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schwartzsciara.com/?p=389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supreme Court Won&#8217;t Stay $20,000 Fine on &#8216;Birther&#8217; Attorney
Marcia Coyle
The National Law Journal
August 17, 2010
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay $20,000 in sanctions against attorney-dentist Orly Taitz, a leading figure in the so-called &#8220;birther movement.&#8221;
Taitz was fined by U.S. District Judge Clay Land of Columbus, Ga., last year in connection with her motion [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/birther-attorneys-20000-fine-allowed-to-stand-by-supreme-court/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Third Trial, Blogger Found Guilty Of Threatening United States Appellate Judges</title>
		<link>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/in-third-trial-blogger-found-guilty-of-threatening-united-states-appellate-judges</link>
		<comments>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/in-third-trial-blogger-found-guilty-of-threatening-united-states-appellate-judges#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schwartzsciara.com/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Third Trial, Blogger Found Guilty of Threatening 7th Circuit Judges
Mark Fass
New York Law Journal
August 16, 2010 
A Brooklyn federal jury has found blogger and Internet-radio shock jock Harold &#8220;Hal&#8221; Turner guilty of threatening to kill three judges from the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
After two mistrials, the third jury needed only 95 minutes to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/in-third-trial-blogger-found-guilty-of-threatening-united-states-appellate-judges/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Videotaping The Police Be A Crime?</title>
		<link>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/should-videotaping-the-police-be-a-crime</link>
		<comments>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/should-videotaping-the-police-be-a-crime#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schwartzsciara.com/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CASE STUDY
Should Videotaping the Police Really Be a Crime?
By ADAM COHEN Wednesday, Aug. 04, 2010

 Anthony Graber, a Maryland Air National Guard staff sergeant, faces up to 16 years in prison. His crime? Hevideotaped his March encounter with a state trooper who pulled him over for speeding on a motorcycle. Then Graber put the video — which could put [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/should-videotaping-the-police-be-a-crime/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal District Judge Finds California Ban On Gay Marriage Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/federal-district-judge-finds-california-ban-on-gay-marriage-unconstitutional</link>
		<comments>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/federal-district-judge-finds-california-ban-on-gay-marriage-unconstitutional#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 22:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schwartzsciara.com/?p=380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal Judge Finds No Rational Basis for Prop 8
Kate Moser
The Recorder
August 04, 2010
Chief Judge Vaughn Walker struck down Proposition 8 today, finding that it violated gay Californians&#8217; equal protection and due process rights under the U.S. Constitution.
In a 136-page decision released just before 2 p.m. Pacific time, Walker said that the measure &#8220;fails to advance [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/federal-district-judge-finds-california-ban-on-gay-marriage-unconstitutional/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schwartz + Sciara Assists Client to Settle Dispute with Business Partners</title>
		<link>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/news/schwartz-sciara-assists-client-to-settle-with-business-partners</link>
		<comments>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/news/schwartz-sciara-assists-client-to-settle-with-business-partners#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Namit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Namit Bammi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Namit Bammi chicago Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Attorney Namit Bammi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schwartzsciara.com/?p=373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Schwartz + Sciara attorney, Namit Bammi, successfully assisted a client in settling a business dispute which involved multiple parties and an eventual separation from the business entity which included assisting the client with absolving the majority of his debt.
Client and business partner formed an LLC to purchase and manage multiple assets.  With the current state [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/news/schwartz-sciara-assists-client-to-settle-with-business-partners/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Trims &#8220;Miranda&#8221; Warning Rights Bit by Bit</title>
		<link>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/supreme-court-trims-miranda-warning-rights-bit-by-bit</link>
		<comments>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/supreme-court-trims-miranda-warning-rights-bit-by-bit#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 17:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schwartzsciara.com/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justice Sotomayor says the majority&#8217;s latest decision &#8216;turns Miranda upside down&#8217;
Jesse J. Holland
The Associated Press
August 02, 2010 
You have the right to remain silent, but only if you tell the police that you&#8217;re remaining silent.

You have a right to a lawyer &#8212; before, during and after questioning, even though the police don&#8217;t have to tell you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.schwartzsciara.com/uncategorized/supreme-court-trims-miranda-warning-rights-bit-by-bit/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
